The Secret History by Donna Tartt, published July 1993 by Penguin Books.
Read: February 2016
Get It Now: Wordery
Goodreads Synopsis: Truly deserving of the accolade Modern Classic, Donna Tartt’s cult bestseller The Secret History is a remarkable achievement – both compelling and elegant, dramatic and playful.
Under the influence of their charismatic classics professor, a group of clever, eccentric misfits at an elite New England college discover a way of thinking and living that is a world away from the humdrum existence of their contemporaries. But when they go beyond the boundaries of normal morality their lives are changed profoundly and for ever.
This was a super strange reading experience for me. I don’t often read literary fiction, and occasionally I felt myself struggling a little with this slow-burn, lazily-paced suspense novel. That being said, it kept me entertained and made for addictive reading. Even though it wasn’t an “oh my God, this is amazing” read, I still enjoyed coming back to it every evening, and felt compelled to finish it.
Tartt does something really unusual in that this book starts by telling you a character was killed. More than that, it tells you up-front which character was killed – you’d think that would kind of kill the suspense, right? Interestingly, the suspense is built through telling you the how, where, why, and who-dunnit parts of the murder.
The college setting reads like a character – the descriptions were rich and vivid, and made you feel as though you were there, that you’re one of the elite gang. Speaking of the elite gang, the atmosphere of this group smacks of The Great Gatsby (which in this case, is not a compliment) – there’s a sense of self-importance, entitlement, and grandeur, of self-indulgence and pretence. Basically, all of the negative nouns. While this worked to an extent in terms of characterisation, it also made for a ton of irritation, annoyance, and exasperation for the reader.
As you can imagine, the characters in this novel are hugely complex, and our narrator is highly unreliable – not only because the story-telling is subjective and from his point-of-view, but also because the novel is written as though he is reminiscing about his college years from a much later stage in his life. This complexity, mixed with the sub-plots towards the middle/end, made the novel drag in parts, and there were times were it almost lost me. Almost. I’m beginning to wonder if I made it through this novel simply because it was a more “accessible” piece of literary fiction, and part of me (shamefully) wanted to feel a sense of accomplishment. Overall, I’m glad I read this book, but my feelings about it are really on-the-fence. I’m left feeling incredibly neutral.
As this is Tartt’s debut, I’m interested in reading her more recent work to see how she’s developed as an author. Lucky for me, I already have the tome that is The Goldfinch waiting for me on my shelves… I clearly had a “literary” moment when I bought that one.
Have you read The Secret History? What did you make of it? Let me know in the comments!